The influence of pain and kinesiophobia on motor control of the upper limb: how pointing task paradigms can point to new avenues of understanding.

ABSTRACT: People experiencing kinesiophobia are more likely to develop persistent disabilities and chronic pain. However, the impact of kinesiophobia on the motor system remains poorly understood. We investigated whether kinesiophobia could modulate shoulder pain-induced changes in (1) kinematic parameters and muscle activation during functional movement and (2) corticospinal excitability. Thirty healthy, pain-free subjects took part in the study. Shoulder, elbow, and finger kinematics, as well as electromyographic activity of the upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscles, were recorded while subjects performed a pointing task before and during pain induced by capsaicin at the shoulder. Anterior deltoid cortical changes in excitability were assessed through the slope of transcranial magnetic stimulation input-output curves obtained before and during pain. Results revealed that pain reduced shoulder electromyographic activity and had a variable effect on finger kinematics, with individuals with higher kinesiophobia showing greater reduction in finger target traveled distance. Kinesiophobia scores were also correlated with the changes in deltoid corticospinal excitability, suggesting that the latter can influence motor activity as soon as the motor signal emerges. Taken together, these results suggest that pain and kinesiophobia interact with motor control adaptation.

Cross-cultural translation and psychometric validation of the French version of the Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS).

BACKGROUND: The Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) is a reliable and valid instrument widely used to assess fear-avoidance beliefs related to pain and disability. However, there is a scarcity of validated translations of the FACS in different cultural and linguistic contexts, including the French population. This study aimed to translate and validate the French version of the FACS (FACS-Fr/CF), examining its psychometric properties among French-speaking individuals. METHODS: A cross-cultural translation process-including forward translation, backward translation, expert committee review, and pre-testing-was conducted to develop the FACS-Fr/CF. The translated version was administered to a sample of French-speaking adults (n = 55) with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Internal consistency (including confirmatory analyses of the 2 factors identified in the Serbian version), test-retest reliability and convergent validity were then assessed. RESULTS: The FACS-Fr/CF demonstrated high global internal consistency (α = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.96) as well as high internal consistency of the 2 factors identified in the Serbian version (α = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86-0.94 and α = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94, respectively). Test-retest analysis revealed a moderate (close to high) reliability (ICC = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82-0.94 and r = 0.89; p<0.005). Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between the FACS-Fr/CF scores and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (r = 0.82; p < 0.005), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (r = 0.72; p < 0.005) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (r = 0.66; p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The present study provides evidence for the cross-cultural translation and psychometric validation of the FACS-Fr/CF. The FACS-Fr/CF exhibits a high internal consistency, a moderate (close to high) test-retest reliability, and good construct validity, suggesting its utility in assessing fear-avoidance beliefs in the French-speaking population. This validated tool can enhance the assessment and understanding of fear-avoidance behaviors and facilitate cross-cultural research in pain-related studies.

Treatments for kinesiophobia in people with chronic pain: A scoping review.

Kinesiophobia is associated with pain intensity in people suffering from chronic pain. The number of publications highlighting this relationship has increased significantly in recent years, emphasizing the importance of investigating and synthesizing research evidence on this topic. The purpose of this scoping review was to answer the following questions: (1) What types of interventions have been or are currently being studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the management of kinesiophobia in patients with chronic pain? (2) What chronic pain conditions are targeted by these interventions? (3) What assessment tools for kinesiophobia are used in these interventions? According to the studies reviewed, (1) physical exercise is the most commonly used approach for managing irrational fear of movement, (2) interventions for kinesiophobia have primarily focused on musculoskeletal pain conditions, particularly low back pain and neck pain, and (3) the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is the most commonly used tool for measuring kinesiophobia. Future RCTs should consider multidisciplinary interventions that can help patients confront their irrational fear of movement while taking into account the patient's personal biological, psychological, and social experiences with pain and kinesiophobia.

The influence of kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing on pain-induced corticomotor modulation in healthy participants: A cross sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Several studies suggest that acute pain decreases corticomotor excitability. However, the variability between patients remains important and unexplained. The aim of this study was to unveil potential sources of variation by looking at the effect of kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing on pain-induced corticomotor modulation. METHODS: Corticomotor excitability was assessed with the slopes of recruitment curves measured from the first dorsal interosseous elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation before and during pain induced by capsaicin application on the forearm. Participants completed the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). RESULTS: Twenty-four persons participated in the study. There was a moderate and positive correlation between individual changes in the slope of the recruitment curves and TSK questionnaire scores (rs=0.47; p = 0.02). During the painful condition, unlike those with higher TSK scores, participants with lower TSK scores demonstrated recruitment curves with reduced slopes compared to baseline. There was a difference between changes in the slopes of recruitment curves between individuals with "highest" vs. "lowest" kinesiophobia scores (p = 0.01). No relationship was observed between changes in the slopes of the recruitment curves and PCS scores (p = 0.20). DISCUSSION: The results suggest that kinesiophobia may affect neuromotor processes and influence the corticomotor pain response. CONCLUSIONS: Higher kinesiophobia scores during experimental induced pain were associated with smaller decreases in the slopes of recruitment curves. These findings suggest that there is less inhibition of corticospinal excitability in participants with greater TKS scores.